#SCRIVENER FOR MAC SYNC SERIES#

A bunch of documents in Scrivener that you do not want to include in your timeline, but that will be included in your narrative ( because the narrative is a representation of the Scrivener manuscript folder).Īs you can see, you are dealing with the exact same categories and decisions, it is just the place that you are making the decision now changes slightly.

A bunch of events in your timeline that you do not want to include in Scrivener **OR your narrative.

Some documents in your Scrivener project that you will want to bring Into your timeline AND narrative now.

Some events in your timeline that you will want to bring into Scrivener AND your narrative now.

Then you are applying the exact same decisions as before: With the exception of some basic front matter stuff (title page and the like), if you want it inside your Scrivener manuscript, you want it inside your timeline narrative. Most importantly, treat the narrative inside your timeline as the equivalent of your Scrivener binder.

A kind of staging area for you to make those changes.A visual representation of your Scrivener binder (either what it is now, or what it is about to become).Like I said at the top, you could think of the Narrative View as: Let’s look at the parallels in Aeon Timeline 3 But that is okay, that is just the stage of the project you are up to. It is likely that this process is going to create a fairly messy, unstructured Scrivener project. Move documents from Scrivener to your timeline by dragging them into the timeline.Move events from your timeline to Scrivener by dragging them into the sync panel.A bunch of documents in Scrivener that you do not want to sync to your timeline (yet, or ever)įrom there, you would perform the following actions:.A bunch of events in your timeline that you do not want to sync to Scrivener (yet, or ever).Some documents in your Scrivener project that you will want to bring Into your timeline now.Some events in your timeline that you will want to bring into Scrivener now.Initially, you would have some combination of the following items: Let’s talk about your flow in Version 2 for a second. One way to think about this may be to simply consider the Narrative View (and Outline View) as a visual representation of what your Scrivener manuscript folder looks like. I would not expect to work on a Structure for my novel until I had completed the vast majority of my writing. My entire project is laid out on a sequential basis. Please let me know if it helpful, as it may make sense for me to convert this into a blog post instead. One alternative that I do know some users do is to keep all of their books together in a single Scrivener project, which would achieve a similar effect to what I describe, but work with the current version.

It would be possible, but I suspect there is a lot of devil in those details.

#SCRIVENER FOR MAC SYNC SERIES#

Scrivener projects) in your series should be arranged, and then effectively making one giant binder hierarchy that combines the manuscript across all Scrivener projects. I would imagine it would involve something like specifying the order in which the books (i.e. Syncing is hard enough to present clearly and in a usable interface when there are conflicts from two possible sources, let alone from 3 or more. Yes, that is one of the changes we made to accomodate the more automated syncing between Scrivener and our new narrative feature in the timeline.īeing able to support multiple Scrivener projects again is something I would be happy to explore further, but it will be a fairly difficult feature to get right.

Scrivener for mac sync